☰
☰
Rachel “Raygun” Gunn, the Australian breakdancer who faced widespread ridicule for her viral performance at the 2024 Paris Olympics, finds herself in the spotlight again. This time, the controversy revolves around a lawsuit she filed against the creators of a parody musical based on her. After weeks of public outcry, Gunn has settled the case, but the social media frenzy shows no sign of calming.
Image credits: raygun_aus
The drama began in late September when Raygun: The Musical, a parody by Australian comedian Steph Broadbridge, was announced with a poster and title prominently referencing Gunn. The musical was scheduled to debut in December and humorously recounted her infamous Olympic “kangaroo dance.”
Image credits: nypost
Without Gunn’s consent, the production drew legal action. Gunn’s legal team sent a cease-and-desist letter, demanding the musical be canceled and requesting $10,000 in legal fees, citing potential damage to her career and reputation.
Image credits: formprint
Broadbridge initially responded humorously, suggesting Gunn “didn’t need [her] to damage her career.” However, as the public backlash intensified, both parties agreed to a settlement.
Image credits: nypost
Under the terms, the musical was renamed Breaking: The Musical, A Completely Legal Parody Musical. The new promotional poster replaced Raygun’s silhouette with an actual kangaroo, clarifying that the production was entirely fictional.
Broadbridge apologized for not consulting Gunn before using her name, admitting, “It was never my intention to mislead people into thinking she was involved in the production.” Gunn, meanwhile, clarified that she ultimately chose not to pursue the $10,000 she originally sought.
Image credits: stephbroadbridge
“It wasn’t about the money, and it still isn’t,” Gunn said in a public statement. She also expressed her distress over the backlash, describing it as “negative and awful.”
Social media exploded with criticism of Gunn’s actions, accusing her of attempting to silence creative expression.
Image credits: ChrisSw1977
Image credits: PVonWolvenhause
Image credits: BettyBuilds
Image credits: sparkdriveshart
Image credits: DaleKerr
Image credits: bazarov44
The backlash not only dominated social platforms but also became a talking point across Australian news outlets. Broadbridge’s decision to rename the production and continue with the parody was widely seen as a win for creative freedom.
Image credits: JoHoad1
Image credits: JoyceMarshall3
Image credits: a_fighting_fury
Image credits: Penfanackapan
Image credits: JamesKi67305564
While the lawsuit was initially seen as a threat to the parody’s success, many fans believe it inadvertently boosted the show’s visibility.
Image credits: beat
Broadbridge announced updated show dates, with the renamed production premiering in Adelaide from February 28 to March 2, followed by shows in Sydney in May and Melbourne later in the year. Fans of the comedian praised her resilience, stating the controversy had effectively provided free promotion.
Image credits: smh
The saga highlights broader tensions between public figures and creative freedom. For Gunn, it’s been a stark reminder of how public perception can quickly spiral. For Broadbridge, it underscores the challenges — and opportunities — in creating art inspired by real-life events.
Image credits: BSR Agency / Getty
Despite the resolution, the discourse surrounding the lawsuit and its implications for parody works shows no sign of subsiding, cementing the story as yet another chapter in Raygun’s controversial legacy.
